Deep Learning-Driven Cognitive Load Optimization in Primary Science Education: A Model of AI Powered Personalization in the Digital Era

Authors

  • Dewi Juniayanti Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Dwijendra
  • Ni Wayan Purnamasari Dewi Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Dwijendra

Keywords:

cognitive load, deep learning, AI personalization, primary education, science learning, instructional efficiency

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of deep learning based personalization in optimizing cognitive load and enhancing learning efficiency in primary science education. Drawing upon Cognitive Load Theory, the research addresses how advanced AI models specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architectures can dynamically adjust instructional content to meet learners’ cognitive needs in real time. Using a quasi-experimental design, 50 Grade 5 students were divided into AI and control groups, with the intervention delivered via an AI-enhanced Learning Management System (LMS). Quantitative findings reveal a 28.5% reduction in extraneous cognitive load and a 22.2% increase in germane cognitive load among the AI group, alongside higher post-test performance and a superior learning efficiency index (0.72 vs. 0.48). These outcomes suggest that the AI-driven system effectively minimized unnecessary processing while fostering deeper engagement and schema construction. Qualitative data from classroom observations and student interviews further support these results, highlighting increased learner autonomy, metacognitive awareness, and instructional responsiveness. Teachers benefited from real-time analytics, enabling more adaptive and differentiated instruction. The study concludes that deep learning personalization not only improves cognitive efficiency but also transforms the instructional landscape by supporting more equitable, individualized, and cognitively attuned science learning environments. These findings offer critical implications for digital pedagogy, curriculum design, and AI integration in STEAM education, particularly in underrepresented or early learning contexts. By reengineering science instruction through intelligent technologies, this research contributes to the development of future-ready, inclusive education systems grounded in cognitive science and data-informed personalization.

References

Barefoot TEFL Teacher. (n.d.). Cognitive Load Theory [Infographic]. Retrieved from https://www.barefootteflteacher.com

Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332.

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 9, 36645–36664. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058969

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Kalyuga, S. (2020). Enhancing instructional efficiency: Leveraging the cognitive load theory. Frontiers in Education, 5, 579683. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.579683

Leppink, J., Paas, F., van der Vleuten, C., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). Cognitive load theory: Advancing research in education and educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–272.

Leppink, J., Paas, F., van Gog, T., van der Vleuten, C. P., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an Instrument for Measuring Different Types of Cognitive Load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2023). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO.

Paas, F., & van Gog, T. (2006). Optimising Worked Example Instruction: Different Methods of Fading Worked Examples. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 87–103.

Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122–133.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

Tuomi, I. (2022). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Learning, Teaching, and Education. European Commission Research Papers, 32(4), 55–76.

Tuomi, I. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education. European Commission Joint Research Centre.

Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. Y. (2023). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2017 to 2022. Computers & Education, 193, 104680.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1–27.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Juniayanti, D., & Dewi, N. W. P. (2025). Deep Learning-Driven Cognitive Load Optimization in Primary Science Education: A Model of AI Powered Personalization in the Digital Era. International Conference on Education for All, 3(1), 29–38. Retrieved from http://proceedings.alptkptm.org/index.php/iceduall/article/view/72

Issue

Section

Articles